Facebook Google Plus Twitter LinkedIn YouTube RSS Menu Search Resource - BlogResource - WebinarResource - ReportResource - Eventicons_066 icons_067icons_068icons_069icons_070

阅读“是什么原因造成漏洞在修复战中得以幸存”

In the first of our three-part series, Tenable Research unveils the key findings from our new report on common persistent vulnerabilities, including their likely causes and the importance of prioritization to effectively reduce cyber risk.

Why do some vulnerabilities persist longer than others? And how should that influence your remediation process? 

In its latest report, Tenable Research looks at the common persistent vulnerabilities that often linger on enterprise systems for months, even years. As the number of potential attack vectors multiplies each year, our findings show that many dangerous threats persist longer than they should, in large part because traditional remediation models are ineffective. 

The first of our three-part blog series provides an overview of the background, research methods and key findings behind this report.

The challenge: CVSS is risk-blind

The last few years have seen a staggering growth in the number of vulnerabilities disclosed. In 2019, over 17,000 vulnerabilities were added to the U.S. National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Given this large volume of vulnerabilities, remediating every one present on an organization’s systems is unsustainable. 

Security teams must prioritize vulnerabilities to ensure they are effectively reducing risk and not misapplying limited resources. However, they have largely been left to their own devices for prioritization. Many organizations have adopted the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), a metric designed to describe the technical nature of vulnerabilities, to drive prioritization. But, the misinterpretation and misuse of CVSS only compounds the problem, as CERT researchers noted in their paper on the topic:

“CVSS is designed to identify the technical severity of a vulnerability. What people seem to want to know, instead, is the risk a vulnerability or flaw poses to them, or how quickly they should respond to a vulnerability.” 1

This lack of prioritization exposes organizations to risk, as vulnerabilities go unremediated even as they are actively being exploited in the wild. 

Research methodology

To better understand the nature of this remediation gap, we sought answers to the following research questions: 

  1. Causes of persistence: Do the characteristics of vulnerabilities affect their persistence? Or, is persistence merely related to the remediation process and its pace? 
  2. Variance in remediation: Are there vulnerability remediation differences between organizations? And, are there differences within each organization?

Tenable has one of the most extensive vulnerability and intelligence datasets in the industry. It is derived from a 4.5-petabyte data lake of vulnerability data collected from over 10 different sources, including open-source and commercial intelligence feeds.

We analyzed Time to Remediate data and leveraged the interquartile range technique for outlier detection. The main goal was to understand what makes a vulnerability survive in the remediation race.

We only considered Time to Remediate data on vulnerabilities assessed within three months of their initial publication to NVD (i.e., vulnerabilities assessed from -1 to +3 months from their NVD publication date). This accounts for an average of a one-month delay for NVD publication.2

Key findings: Why prioritization beats the remediation race

Our analysis revealed many shortcomings in traditional remediation practices. Even as security teams work around the clock to defend their attack surface, if they are remediating threats based on CVSS data alone, there is no guarantee those efforts are effectively reducing their overall cyber risk. A few key stats that validate this conclusion: 

  • Exploitable vulnerabilities often fly under the radar. Despite their higher risk, vulnerabilities with exploits show roughly the same persistence as those with no available exploit. Defenders are still operating as though all vulnerabilities have the same likelihood of exploitation.
  • Client-side vulnerabilities are the most persistent threats. Over 60 percent of persistent client-side vulnerabilities have been exploited in the wild, compared to just 38 percent across the population at large. Vendors ought to make it easier for customers to fix their products, and security teams must prioritize difficult-to-upgrade software patches. 
  • Few teams can afford to win the remediation race. Only 5.5 percent of organizations prevail in remediating more vulnerabilities than they discover during a given timeframe. This again points to the need for greater prioritization, as attaining 100-percent remediation is unsustainable for most organizations.

Security teams need data-driven tools that can help them work smarter and drive effective remediation. Predictive Prioritization combines proprietary Tenable-collected data with third-party threat intelligence to continually reassess vulnerabilities based on proper threat modeling. This approach, powered by an advanced data science algorithm developed by Tenable Research, enables organizations to focus on the small fraction – roughly three percent – of vulnerabilities that pose actual risk.

The best way for organizations to gain ground against cyberthreats is to change the remediation game altogether. In the next two installments of this series, we’ll dive into the data to look at the lifespan of vulnerabilities as well as remediation trends across the global population. If you’d like to get a head start, you can download the full report below.

Download the Free Report

1. CERT, "Towards Improving CVSS," December 2018
2. Recorded Future, "The Race Between Security Professionals and Adversaries," June 2017

相关文章

让网络安全和业务保持一致这绝非易事

作者:Robert Huber • 2020 年 8 月 5 日 - 上午 8:45

订阅 Tenable 博客

订阅
免费试用 立即购买

选择 Tenable.io

免费试用 30 天

可全面访问基于云的现代化漏洞管理平台,从而以无可比拟的精确度发现并追踪所有资产。 立即注册。

立即购买 Tenable.io

可全面访问基于云的现代化漏洞管理平台,从而以无可比拟的精确度发现并追踪所有资产。 立即购买年度订阅。

65 项资产

$2,275

立即购买

免费试用 立即购买

免费试用 Nessus Professional

免费试用 7 天

Nessus® 是当今市场上功能最全面的漏洞扫描器。Nessus Professional 可帮助自动化漏洞扫描流程、节省合规周期的时间,并让您调动起 IT 团队的积极性。

购买 Nessus Professional

Nessus® 是当今市场上功能最全面的漏洞扫描器。Nessus Professional 可帮助自动化漏洞扫描流程、节省合规周期的时间,并让您调动起 IT 团队的积极性。

购买多年期许可,即享优惠价格添加高级支持功能,获取一年 365 天、一天 24 小时的电话、社区和聊天支持。完整介绍请见此处。

免费试用 立即购买

试用 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

免费试用 30 天

完整享有专为现代化应用程序而设、属于 Tenable.io 平台组成部分的最新 Web 应用程序扫描功能。可安全扫描全部在线资产组合的漏洞,具有高度准确性,而且无需繁重的手动操作或中断关键的 Web 应用程序。 立即注册。

购买 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

可全面访问基于云的现代化漏洞管理平台,从而以无可比拟的精确度发现并追踪所有资产。 立即购买年度订阅。

5 个 FQDN

$3,578

立即购买

免费试用 联系销售人员

试用 Tenable.io Container Security

免费试用 30 天

完整获得已集成至漏洞管理平台之唯一容器安全产品的功能。监控容器映像中的漏洞、恶意软件和策略违规。与持续集成和持续部署 (CI/CD) 系统进行整合,以支持 DevOps 实践、增强安全性并支持企业政策合规。

购买 Tenable.io Container Security

Tenable.io Container Security 经由与构建流程的集成,可供全面了解容器映像的安全性,包括漏洞、恶意软件和策略违规,借以无缝且安全地启用 DevOps 流程。

了解有关 Industrial Security 的详情

获取 Tenable.sc 演示

请将您的联系方式填写在下方表格中,我们的销售代表很快与您联系安排演示。您也可以写下简短评论(不得超过 255 个字符)。请注意,带星号 (*) 的字段为必填项。

免费试用 联系销售人员

试用 Tenable Lumin

免费试用 30 天

通过 Tenable Lumin 直观呈现及探索 Cyber Exposure,长期追踪风险降低状况,并比照同行业者进行基准度量。

购买 Tenable Lumin

联系销售代表,了解 Lumin 如何帮助获取整个企业的洞见并管理网络风险。

申请演示 Tenable.ot

获得符合需求的运营技术安全性。
降低避之不及的风险。